--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I deleted this post a few minutes after sending it, seeing that Spraig > did respond with a link of cites (a bit of a shotgun) some of wich > possibly support the SA articles point. > > I am wading through the viable article(s) listed in the link that > appear to support the SA point.
I went through a few of the links also. Ithink you're correct about the SA author extrapolating. The abstracts of some of Bullock's work are extremely conservative compared to what the SA article suggests. I did run into an interview of Bullock where he made reference to his on- going work concerning EEG coherence and evolution, but that's not peer-reviewed research, just speculation. Perhaps the SA author was referring to the interview. BTW, I referred you to the medline search on eeg coherence only to show that there was plenty of scientific interest on the subject, NOT to prove that the TM researcher's emphasis on it was correct. You had indicated that you used the "brainwave coherence" search string and found relatively little. medline or google scholar searches on EEG coherence yields far more hits than the using the same search engines with "brainwave coherence." ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
