--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "geezerfreak" <geezerfreak@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@>
wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I assume that the moderators (Rick, Alex, and
> > > > > whoever) can tell what a poster's real address
> > > > > is behind their Yahoo address. I hereby give
> > > > > them permission to "bust" me publicly here if 
> > > > > their resources show that I (TurquoiseB/Barry) 
> > > > > am the same poster as Geezerfreak.
> > > > 
> > > > Actually, Barry, I can't see your email or IP address because you
> > > > config'd your subscription with the "Hide my email and IP
> address from
> > > > the group moderators" option. And, I don't think Rick, the group
> > > > owner, can see them either. I did look up geezerfreak's IP,
and it's
> > > > an AOL IP. I googled the newest post I could find by Uncle
Tantra on
> > > > a.m.t (Apr 25 2005), and it originated from out-of.ilog.fr
> > > >
> > >   
> > > Of course, logically speaking, Barry could simply write messages
to a
> > > friend in the states who posts them under a yahoo name barry set up.
> > > 
> > > But the "energy signiture" appears quite different between the
two. An
> > > obvious thing Jim appears to have missed. Normally, no harm, no
foul. 
> > > 
> > > But for Jim, who has made (it appears to me) quite definitive and
> > > fully-confident observations based on his ability to clearly
> > > distinguish "energy-signitures" of different people, or to "look at
> > > them a certainway" virtually --not in person --  and "gain specific
> > > knowledge" of them, as well as the ~"only WE can recognize each
other"
> > > phenomenon, it perhaps is significant that his foo foo raydar is
> > > malfunctioning in the case of Barry and Gezzerfreak. Makes you
wonder,
> > > could it also be malfunctioning in other confident observations of
> his?
> > > 
> > > Not to pick-on or focus on Jim, but (mis)interpreting ones
abilities,
> > > experiences and states is a key issue /hurrdle, IMO. This is one
of a
> > > number of examples posted, periodically, where the
interpretation does
> > > not fit the circumstances, though to the observer they really
[really]
> > > seem to. 
> > > 
> > > Thus, perhaps,the value of a Guru who has lived the Supreme
state for
> > > 30-40 years, has seen many false claims and false starts, to
> > > verify and label experiences, and not to solely rely on co-dependent
> > > praises from "a circle of friends." [Termed a "circle jerk" by one
> > wag".]
> > > 
> > > As to states of consciousness that Barry brought up, on the surface,
> > > there appears little connection to the ability to distinguish two
> > > posters -- and the state of ones consciousness. 
> > > 
> > > Unless, if one claims they have special knowledge, insights and
> > > abilities that stem from their "Enlightenment" -- however defined --
> > > and these special abilities are shown to be only imaginations,
then it
> > > does cast some shadows on claims of total Enlightenment. And/or the
> > > persons correct interpretation of what they experience.
> 
> 
> 
> > Good lord people....the paranoia! 
> 
> Paranoia? In the comments direcly above? Oh My.
>
No New Morning, not the post "direcly" above....I was refering to the
string for chrissakes. Nice post the other day about....what was the
title? Anyway, you know the one. I have to print that one out and
really digest it.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to