--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > wrote: > > > > On Dec 11, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Rick Archer wrote: > > > > > For this they use several translators. Three inside the group > > > but some outside the fence/cage. (The pundits' living area is a > > > cantonment surrounded by a high chain link fence, covered with > > > a tarp, so that they cannot get out or even see out, except > > > out the rear in the direction of some private stapathya ved > > > homes, nor can others get or see in.) > > > My personal feeling it's not the best for them. > > > > Understatement of the year. Is this even legal? Once more the > > TMO goes out of its way to show its warmth, friendliness, and > > ability to deal effectively with reality. What's next, I > > wonder--underground bunkers? > > "What's next" is fairly obvious. One or more of these > pundit kids is going to make a break for it, and leave > the compound. What the TM movement *does* about that > will be interesting to see. >
What is thelegal basis for their being here in the first place? If they are employees of MUM or Maharishi Vedic City or something, there are certain laws governing their behavior. Of course there are also laws protecting them from their employers. Are you suggesting that the pundits have some legal recourse to sue the TMO because they aren't being given daily tours of the area, or something?
