--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> On Jan 8, 2007, at 3:21 AM, cardemaister wrote:
> 
> > Vyaasa doesn't seem to agree with you:
> >
> > tasya saMyamasya jayaat samaadhiprajñaayaa bhavatyaaloko
> > yathaa yathaa saMyamaH sthirapado bhavati tathaa tatheshvara-
> > prasaadaat *samaadhi-prajñaa ***VISHAARADII*** bhavati*
> 
> 
> Actually he says you must *conquer* ("jayAt") samyama. This is  
> because samyama is mixed with chains of dhyana and dharana. It is  
> considered "external" to seedless samadhi. Seedless samadhi only  
> occurs when the triad of samyama is not present.
>

Since it is pure, that's kinda redundant. Nothing wrong with redundant, but 
don't get all 
excited about it.  The word literally (according to one source) means "winning 
edge," and I 
get an intution of a divine cut, where the less pure is on one side, and the 
more pure is on 
the other. Just as in the first chapter, there is a PROGRESSION towards purity 
(seedless 
samadhi). It's not a matter of advanced techniques vs non-advanced, but of 
mastery 
(jayàt). My favorite multi-translation site's version is below. The "V" 
commentary is Vyasa's.

http://www.bindu.freeserve.co.uk/yoga/yogasutra/ys3_comments.htm#sutra3.5

YS 3.5  
tajjayàtpraj¤àlokaþ

tad - that; jayàt - through victory, from mastery; praj¤à - higher knowledge, 
higher 
consciousness; lokaþ - light

Translations:
[B] The light of the highest knowledge comes from acquisition of this perfect 
mastery. 
[D] Samyama on a chosen object leads to a comprehensive knowledge of the object 
in all 
its aspects.
[F] Through mastery of that [practice of constraint there comes about] the 
flashing-forth 
of wisdom (praj¤à). 
[H] By mastering that, the light of knowledge dawns. 
[R] By the achievement thereof comes the light of knowledge. 
[S] By the mastery of samyama comes the light of knowledge. 
[T] By mastering it (samyama) the light of the higher consciousness.

Commentary:
V says, "As samyama gets firmly established, so does the knowledge attained in 
samàdhi 
get purer and purer."

H's explanation of V is that "as samyama is practised in respect of more and 
more subtle 
objects, the knowledge gets more and more clear."


Reply via email to