--- In [email protected], "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Vaj writes:
> Actually he says you must *conquer* ("jayAt") samyama. This is  
> because samyama is mixed with chains of dhyana and dharana. It is  
> considered "external" to seedless samadhi. Seedless samadhi only  
> occurs when the triad of samyama is not present.
> 
> Tom T:
> Chapter and verse please. I would like to verify this claim. Thanks Tom
>


See YS 3.3-3.10

Vaj likes to take a single translation that fits his notions about what MUST be 
the ase. 
That's fine. I like to look at several different translations and intuit how 
they fit in with 
what MMY says and taught me. There's no way to prove who is correct about this, 
despite 
what Vaj claims, until such time as perfect mastery of the sidhis is 
demonstrated in a 
labratory setting.

Samyama involves subtle fluctuations of the mind. The sidhis take place at the 
most subtle 
level, but they are still fluctuations. That doesn't mean that seedless samadhi 
doesn't 
happen during sutra practice, just that the sidhis aren't manifest during that 
state (how 
could they be since sidhis are a relative, intentional thing?). Seedless 
samadhi is turiya, 
what Vaj likes to call the "fourth pranayama." But there is NO characteristic 
of the fourth. 
That's why nothing is said of it.


Specifically, YS 3.8 says:

http://www.bindu.freeserve.co.uk/yoga/yogasutra/ys3_comments.htm#sutra3.3



YS 3.8  
tadapi bahiraïgaü nirbãjasya

tad -this; api - even, same, as well; bahiþ - external; aïgaü - limb; 
nirbãjasya - 
contemplation without seed

Translations:
[B] These last three limbs must themselves be seen as external compared to 
contemplation 
without a seed. 
[D] The state where the mind has no impressions of any sort and nothing is 
beyond its 
reach (nirbãja samàdhi) is more intricate than the state of directing the mind 
towards an 
object (samàdhi).
[F] Yet, they are outer limbs (bahir-anga) [in regard to] the seedless 
[ecstasy].
[H] That also is (to be regarded as) external in respect of nirbãja or seedless 
concentration.
[R] Even that is non-intimate to the seedless.
[S] Even these three are external to the seedless samadhi.
[T] Even that (Sabãja samàdhi) is external to the Seedless (Nirbãja samàdhi).

Reply via email to