--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > I think we need to be realistic here. If we're talking about 
a  
> > > > legitimate master, it definitely would be harmful in terms 
of  
> > > > planetary evolution to disparage  such a master.
> > > > 
> > > > Faux-masters and avatards are a different thing altogether.
> > > 
> > > One wonders about the karma of those who pretend
> > > to be able to tell the difference, and then, on the
> > > basis of that faux expertise, proceed to bash a 
> > > teacher and tell lies about him out of pure spite.
> > 
> > The only bad karma coming from disparaging a master is the 
> > karma already evident from those doing this- that they have 
> > no mechanism within their egoic dream to distiguish a true 
> > master from a fraud. 
> > 
> > This joker Vaj is a prime example, puffed up like a peacock, 
> > and spouting rubbish. No offense to the peacock...
> 
> The following was part of an email exchange 
> that was forwarded here about a month ago by Rick. 
> Neither the email, its excellent subject matter, 
> or the following quote provoked a word of comment 
> on FFL. One person asked which Dave the author of
> the email was, but that was it. I "replay" the 
> quote again, seeing if it gets more comment
> when presented more in context:

Comment: One wonders whether Guru Dev would have
made a distinction between sincere, well-meaning
criticism and the kind of dishonest, vengeful
bullshit Vaj and you post.



> "Correctly, correctly but the idea behind this is
> that one shall not think badly of his master. But 
> now I would suggest that you think about it for a 
> moment, whether it is in principle harmful to be 
> criticized or whether it can be even helpful?
> 
> The scriptures even say that criticism helps the 
> earnest seeker and even the wise, to wash off their 
> sins and that in reality criticism is a support for 
> their spiritual development.
> 
> Many saints therefore put their loudest critics on 
> the same level with their most devoted supporters.
> 
> The supporters serve the mahatmas and admire them
> but they also take part in the wealth of their 
> spiritual strengths; the critics however take nothing 
> for themselves, they wash only the sins away.
> 
> We should be really very grateful for the agreeable 
> service their criticism does and therefore should not 
> try to suffocate it."
> 
> -- Guru Dev
>


Reply via email to