jim flanegin wrote: > Everyone apparently knows Sudarsha's real name, so there must be > another reason for it. > Well, Jim, I'd be willing to surmise that nobody knows that Sudarsha is Tom Anderson on this group. His name isn't even on the list of personal secretarys that administered to Maharishi at Spain TTC.
>From what I can tell, Tom must have been lying about being Maharishi's personal secretary. Apparently the other secretarys didn't even know him or never even heard of him, yet according to Tom, he was a very high mukety-muck. Either way, it demonstrates that the skin boys, like the erstwhile Ned and Conny, are really mixed up. The truth is that probably not a single individual listed was ever even anywhere near the Maharishi at TTC. And if they were, and didn't see anything like what's described in the archives on this forum, then I'd say they are not even skin-boys for a single minute. According to my sources, the Maharishi wasn't even in a hotel room at TTC - he was flown in on a helicopter each day to give his talk in the lobby and then he went back to Meru in Switzerland to be with Ms Pittman. However, it's obvious that someone is doing some real lying around here. For what purpose, I don't know. Why don't you go over to TMFree Blog and ask Tom? He wouldn't answer my questions and John Knapp deleted them. While you're over there, you might ask Paul, Don, Gina, and Tom why, in over ten years of posting Maharishi-bashing messages to the Internet, they never once mentioned anything about Maharishi having sex with students. I guess the informers over there don't like to be questioned about their veracity. Same applies to the ankle-biting pundit over here. What I can't figure out is why you're still here. Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to, I guess. Go figure. http://tmfree.blogspot.com/2007/01/sex-single-guru-really-long.html
