--Thanks, Richard, as always. Qntmpkt is my e mail name, not my real name, which I prefer to keep anonymous. To summarize: Jerry Jarvis initiated me into TM in July, 1967. I worked at SIMS in L.A. as a paid employee from 1970 through 1973 (where Jerry worked also, being Chairman of SIMS).; and I became acquainted with MMY's barber who also worked there, whose name has already been mentioned. The barber was well known on the West Coast. You are indeed correct. This is 2nd hand information since I was not a witness to MMY's philandering. The barber was; and this type of evidence (I'm in law); can be used in court proceedings although the weight of such evidence is obviously downgraded from first-hand eyewitness accounts. When coming to your own conclusion, collect as much evidence as possible and then make your decision. Again, if you have any doubts that MMY's barber worked at SIMS, feel free to contact Jerry Jarvis at PO Box 4052, Malibu, CA 90264. Sincerely, and JGD, qntmpkt
In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > qntmpkt wrote: > > The Barber saw MMY having sex. > > > It has NOT been established that a "Barber" saw > MMY having sex. All we have established is that > you made the claim that a barber once told you > such-and-such. Do you have any proof other than > just plain hearsay that MMY was having sex? > > Has the MMY been cross-examined? I think not. > > > The barber told me in 1973. > > > The barber story is now three times removed from > the actual purported event. Why should I even > believe that a barber once told you anything except > that your hair was dirty? > > Never heard of a "qntmpkt" at TTC. You're not listed > on the approved TMer list at the TM Center at Fairfield. > Never heard of a "qntmpkt" Minister or Governor in > the TMO either. Have you Billy? Who is this guy that > hangs out with barber rumor-mongers? > > > (went over this 12 times)...if you can't > > accept the truth, you have some type of blockage. > > > The truth is that the barber was probably lying > and you've apparently accepted his word for it, > now you have a blockage to using plain logic. > > Now who would you believe: > > A very large group of people, all standing on the > corner, who all said that they never saw a big > blue bus go by. > > Or, a nameless barber, standing on the same street > corner, who said that a big blue bus just drove by. > > Billy wrote: > > > > The 'article' is in error as you mentioned, > > > > *because* she said the affair started in > > > > 1969 at the (reported) age of MMY at 68 > > > > years old. > > > > > Richard J. Williams wrote: > > > So, she is saying that MMY was celibate up to > > > the age of 68, then, for one year he wasn't > > > celibate, then from 1969 till today he was > > > celibate. So, he must have had sexual relations > > > with females for a year, yet neither Ms Pittman > > > nor Nandi Keshore, Magic Alex, John, Paul, George, > > > Ringo, Mike, Donovan or any skin boy or personal > > > secretary, such as Tom Anderson, ever saw him > > > actually doing it, even with the door wide open > > > and with thousands of students passing by on a > > > daily basis for over fifty years. And that the > > > Indian press never suspected a thing. > > > > > > Now that is impressive for a 106 year old man! > > > > > >
