--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Claudiouk, > > Please tell me the definitions you'd have for consciousness, the > Absolute, Being, and the Unified Field. I think you're being fuzzy > and mixing the Absolute with Being, but I see Being as the relative, > qualities that must be described dualistically -- thus, I would say > that the Unified Field is a good metaphor for Being, not the > Absolute. > > This fuzziness is what I finally decided was a "tell" about the > lack of subtlety for Maharishi's vocabulary. > > To me, soul, consciousness, Being, atma, are all "in" the relative. > They're egoically spawned concepts. > > Tell me your definitions for awareness and sentience while > you're at it. > > To me the Absolute is pure mystery -- Being can pretend to be the > Absolute, even fool the rishi's that it is the Absolute, but I've > seen the Absolute, and Being, I gotta tell ya, "you're no Jack > Kennedy." > > Anyone else want a piece of this?
In my understanding, Consciousness, Being, Absolute, and Unified Field are all synonymous in MMY's teaching.
