lurkernomore20002000 wrote: > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> --- In [email protected], "lurkernomore20002000" >> <steve.sundur@> wrote: >> >>> --- In [email protected], Duveyoung <no_reply@> >>> > wrote: > >>> How about we each post a black list that is always at the end >>> > of any > >>>> of our posts. If I put someone on my list, then that someone >>>> > will > >>> get dumped if they write to me. >>> >>> This thing could have legs. >>> >> But how would it work, exactly? What does "write to >> me" mean on a forum like this? Address the person >> directly, by name? Address the person indirectly by >> name? Comment on one of the person's posts, or on >> their behavior generally, without mentioning their >> name? >> > > I think you're right. The forum is the way it is. Too much fine > tuning will not work. > > lurk And perhaps all this desire to change things (to put it into the TMO vernacular) is just "unstressing." :)
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Civil Speech and Behavior Bronte Baxter
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Civil Speech and Behavior Marek Reavis
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Civil Speech and Behavior curtisdeltablues
- [FairfieldLife] VOTE to change the rules and VOT... billy jim
- [FairfieldLife] NEW IDEA!!!! (VOTE to change... Duveyoung
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!! (VOTE t... lurkernomore20002000
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!! (VO... authfriend
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!... lurkernomore20002000
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDE... Bhairitu
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!... Duveyoung
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!... authfriend
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!... new . morning
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!... authfriend
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!... new . morning
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!... authfriend
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!... new . morning
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!... authfriend
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!... new . morning
- [FairfieldLife] Re: NEW IDEA!!!... authfriend
