--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> [This is not specifically addressing Bronte, but several posts along
> these lines.]
> 
> People appear to be asking,  "How close over the edge can I go 
before
> I really get busted?" Or that appears to be the premise behind their
> points.
> 
> Its like calling up the Highway Patrol and asking "I know the speed
> limit is 65, and I know most people don't get a ticket at 70, but 
how
> fast can I really drive before I get a ticket? 74? 76? 80? And will
> you state that in writing? " The Highway patrol isn't going to 
answer
> that sort of question. 
> 
> A parallel applies here. Don't be rude, don't be nasty, don't be
> dismissive, don't try to diminish someone. If you refrain from these
> things you will never get busted. In the same way that if you don't
> drive over 65 you will never be busted.
> 
> If you do go over the line, you might be busted. The more blatant 
you
> are, the higher there probability.
> 
> There is no virtue in personal attacks. Don't even go near the 
line. 
> 
> There is no ambiguity between blatant rude, name calling personal
> attacks and the absence of such.   
> 
> There is also almost no ambiguity subtle rude, name calling subtle
> personal attacks and the absence of such.  
> 
> You can be busted for either. Not much error involved in either 
call. 
> 
> If there is error, I suggest Rick err on the aggressive side. Its 
only
> a week suspension. You won't die from that. And you were busted  for
> breaking the guidelines. How far over you went is immaterial. 
> 
> If one simply does not make personal attacks, they will have no
> problem. No ambiguity.

I think this is an incredibly naive idea that
doesn't take the real world, let alone FFL,
into account. It's a superficial, cartoonish,
shallow view of human interaction that makes
nonexistent black/white distinctions.

It's also an idea that smacks of fascism, in that
it approves of rules so vague that they can be
twisted to apply--or not apply--to anything,
depending on the whim of the administrator, who
obviously likes some people here more than others
(he wouldn't be human if he didn't).

In my view, it's a very foolish idea that has the
potential to destroy this group.


Reply via email to