mhair (sent by Nabble.com) wrote: > I'm curious how running in a virtual server instance has resolved your > problems. This is something I was interested in trying as a possible > solution to the farcry mapping problems that have been so widely reported. > It's not likely to be a good production solution, but if it is, perhaps I'm > not aware fo the use of virtual server software for hosting.
The mapping problems you are referring to.. I'm assuming this is simply a case of there being only one FarCry CF mapping available per CF server instance? This is a common problem for most frameworks that use component inheritance and/or cfimport. If hosts took the time to understand the framework a bit better then it would certainly be possible to run as many farycry projects as you like off a single FarCry library installation. The mapping is only ever a potential issue in shared hosting environments -- having a "virtual" server eliminates the issue of having to share the CF mapping. -- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/ -- Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content filtering. http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
