On Mar 5, 1:14 pm, Matthew Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you doing any scaling with these images? I'm curious to see how you > handle the session replication amongst them. So, is 5.1 running pretty > stable on BlueDragon? If so, the EC2 thing would be a way more viable > solution for some of the stuff we're trying to push than using HMS (and > it'd have a better CPU and memory specs). I've been tasked with making > it so, and I'm really rather exited about it ;). Heck, I'm actually > going to get paid to do it too! Bonus!
Well ideally we'd like to have a rentable image to which you can attach any size of virtual -- for example, if it costs 10c per hour for a normal EC2 image we'd charge something like 12.5c per hour to have a fully supported FarCry stack. Exactly which CF engine that incorporates has not been decided. At this stage, the hardest thing for us is getting set up as an Amazon re-seller. However, we are well on the way with this. -- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
