X-Comment-To: Bart Oldeman Hi!
6-δΕΛ-2002 14:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> > Thank you. BTW, what mean "non-exclusive licenses" in sense of applying >> > to different distributions (releases) of same software? >> When I read your question, I first thought, this is obvious. But the >> more I think about it, the less obvious it is... BO> I read "non-exclusive" as "may not contradict each other". Yes, me too - although Andreas retreat this as "exclisive rights". BO> If I write software under license A and B and then license A says: this BO> code may not be released under any other license, then I would be BO> contradicting myself (hence, a fairly technical issue, sue yourself!). But any commercial license (which restricts distribution) contradicts to GPL! BO> And yes, ethically tainted comes from the FSF position that all non-free BO> (as in speech) software is ethically wrong. ---------- list options/archives/etc.: http://www.topica.com/lists/fd-dev unsubscribe: send blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==^^=============================================================== This email was sent to: archive@mail-archive.com EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Rv5.bbRv4l.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^^===============================================================