X-Comment-To: Bart Oldeman
Hi!
6-���-2002 14:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> > Thank you. BTW, what mean "non-exclusive licenses" in sense of applying
>> > to different distributions (releases) of same software?
>> When I read your question, I first thought, this is obvious. But the
>> more I think about it, the less obvious it is...
BO> I read "non-exclusive" as "may not contradict each other".
Yes, me too - although Andreas retreat this as "exclisive rights".
BO> If I write software under license A and B and then license A says: this
BO> code may not be released under any other license, then I would be
BO> contradicting myself (hence, a fairly technical issue, sue yourself!).
But any commercial license (which restricts distribution) contradicts
to GPL!
BO> And yes, ethically tainted comes from the FSF position that all non-free
BO> (as in speech) software is ethically wrong.
----------
list options/archives/etc.: http://www.topica.com/lists/fd-dev
unsubscribe: send blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==^^===============================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Rv5.bbRv4l.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===============================================================
