Andreas K. Foerster wrote:
"To release a non-free program is always ethically tainted"??? Is the author talking specifically about RE-releasing software that was under a "free" license under a non-free license, or is he speaking generally?? (If it's the first answer, then the author worded that paragraph VERY poorly).There is also a GPL-FAQ: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.htmlPassage from this FAQ: I would like to release a program I wrote under the GNU GPL, but I would like to use the same code in non-free programs. To release a non-free program is always ethically tainted, but legally there is no obstacle to your doing this. If you are the copyright holder for the code, you can release it under various different non-exclusive licenses at various times.
----------
list options/archives/etc.: http://www.topica.com/lists/fd-dev
unsubscribe: send blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Rv5.bbRv4l.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
