Having passed this paper I feel somewhat guilty to be handing out advice on what you should not leave out.
Notwithstanding this, I think its a big risk to be leaving out Defamation and/or Passing Off. Defamation is almost a banker and if I recall correctly when it is omitted from the paper Passing Off takes it's place. Occupiers Liability seems like a big one to leave out too but personally I always found Occupiers to be a nice area to cover. This is a stinker of a paper and the conventional wisdom amongst of the FE-1 brigade, that it is better to know a little about a lot rather than a lot about a little, definitely applies here in my experience. Also in this exam, and I'm sure you're all aware of this, there is always a problem question that will, if not read properly, cause you to apply the law in relation to one tort when in fact he is examining you about a completely different topic. The obvious examples of this in recent years is Defamation/Passing off and Nervous Shock/ Intention to Harm. On Oct 9, 5:37 pm, Yvonne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm thinking of leaving out the following in tort: > > Economic Loss & Negligent Misstatement > Public Authority Liability > Breach of Statutory Duty > Occupiers Liability > Liability for Defective Products > Liability for Defective Premises > Passing Off > State Liability > > Looking at that list now it seems like an awful lot to be leaving out > seeing as nearly every part of the course could come up!! > > Anyone got any insight into which of the above I should also cover? > > Thanks! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
