"It doesnt make sense that there is no limit to the amountt of students that can sit the exams with no regard to the future of those students."
I certainly agree with all the sentiments herein. However, just imagine if there were such limits and you found yourself on the wrong end of a cut-off point? I think its just the way everything has been going that regulatory bodies can't just limit access to professions. The logic is that markets should do that - if the job is unattractive, no-one will do it. If people are trying to do, it must be attractive. But I think that works best on assumptions of perfect information. Our real gripe, I think, is that people still have, as you rightly say, the over-glamourised view of the job. I would hate to see, however, any introduction of caps or limits. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
