If you read the case they talk about the issue coming up in the AG opinions of two earlier cases but it was only finally decided by the ECJ in February. It was an important issue so he would have known that the case was due to be decided. The ECJ even got all the MS to submit opinions before they made their decision so it was a huge case on the horizon when he wrote the papers.
He did the same with the Metock question last year. It must have been decided after the papers were written up but it's so important that he would have known it was coming down the line and asked the question anyway. Also gives you the opportunity to say how you would argue it even if you haven't heard about the case. On Apr 5, 12:41 pm, b05bf1e4 <[email protected]> wrote: > Regarding the FMoGs question, there must have been earlier cases > relevant other than the one 10 weeks ago that we're maybe not aware > of? > I'd assume that the papers are made up long before then, and possibly > christmas, because they'd have to be ok'd by the extern etc... > > On Apr 5, 7:53 am, Denham Legend <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sorry for being so aggravating. I honestly didn't intend to be and > > wish you all the best of luck in the rest of the exams. Actually, I am > > still in college and would be the first to admit that I have a lot of > > growing up still to do. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
