It seems to me a lot of people's perceived problems with the paper are to do with whether they have gotten the right answer or not. As my lecturer used to tell me: All good lawyers sit on the fence. The right answer is one that gauges the strength of the arguments in either direction. What is marked by the examiner has little do with the conclusion (although if you do not provide one you cannot get marked for that section) but has everything to do with how you go about coming to that conclusion.
Notorious BIG: apologies if I seem to be talking down to you. My analysis of the course is in comparison to the other FE-1 subjects and in that comparison, I see no reason to believe the EU Law exam is any more vast then the others. It has one of the least amount of topics, very few cases, and all of the relevant legislation is provided. Do you believe that the question on the Commission could have been any easier? Or that the Commission shouldn't be examinable? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
