Anyone else think that Denham Legend is the examiner in disguise, defending his paper??!!!!!!
On Apr 4, 5:07 pm, Denham Legend <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems to me a lot of people's perceived problems with the paper are > to do with whether they have gotten the right answer or not. As my > lecturer used to tell me: All good lawyers sit on the fence. The right > answer is one that gauges the strength of the arguments in either > direction. What is marked by the examiner has little do with the > conclusion (although if you do not provide one you cannot get marked > for that section) but has everything to do with how you go about > coming to that conclusion. > > Notorious BIG: apologies if I seem to be talking down to you. My > analysis of the course is in comparison to the other FE-1 subjects and > in that comparison, I see no reason to believe the EU Law exam is any > more vast then the others. It has one of the least amount of topics, > very few cases, and all of the relevant legislation is provided. Do > you believe that the question on the Commission could have been any > easier? Or that the Commission shouldn't be examinable? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
