Denham Legend: Hmmm, I don't know what came up on the paper and I've only just read what you said given the complaints against as the last posts on this topic but you come across as a bit of a penis. I could be wrong here, but I would say this is your first set of FE-1 exams. We'll wait and see if you pass come June but I think given your attitude that you'll be crawling back here asking people for tips and past papers in September. Even if I;m wrong here, I think your attitude is a bit smug to say the least, maybe it's just the impetuousness of youth, I'm not sure.
Either way, you obviously aren't too hot on your people skills to begin with. Mayhaps a careeer in academia beckons? I have gotten alot of assistance out of this group in the past and equally have tried to help others here too. I think that that is the intended spirit of this group. You're not in college anymore and you really don't have to pretend you did better than everyone else. It's not helpful. To anyone. Oh and your username isn't clever either. Your posts scream immaturity to me. On Apr 4, 5:07 pm, Denham Legend <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems to me a lot of people's perceived problems with the paper are > to do with whether they have gotten the right answer or not. As my > lecturer used to tell me: All good lawyers sit on the fence. The right > answer is one that gauges the strength of the arguments in either > direction. What is marked by the examiner has little do with the > conclusion (although if you do not provide one you cannot get marked > for that section) but has everything to do with how you go about > coming to that conclusion. > > Notorious BIG: apologies if I seem to be talking down to you. My > analysis of the course is in comparison to the other FE-1 subjects and > in that comparison, I see no reason to believe the EU Law exam is any > more vast then the others. It has one of the least amount of topics, > very few cases, and all of the relevant legislation is provided. Do > you believe that the question on the Commission could have been any > easier? Or that the Commission shouldn't be examinable? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
