hi 8th timer, i was just wondering if you had any notes tht you could put up for the O'Keefe case, my book is a couple of years old and so doesnt have it n its too late to start looking for it now!! anything you have would be greatly appreciated as i would defo be doing a question on vic liability if it came up
On Apr 5, 12:29 pm, 8th Timer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Wheely, > > I did the prep course in Ind. Coll this time round and he seems to be > suggesting > > -Defamation > -Med Neg > -Tres to Person - up last six in a row and straight forward > -Psyc damage - as a must do > -Vic Liability - due to the recent SC decision in O'Keefe > -Employers Lia - especially stress related inj. > -R v. F > -Damages as a must do > > Hope that's of some use at this stage, > > Can I ask what people did for the verbal statements question on > contract on wednesday?? Ta > > On Apr 4, 11:30 am, Wheely <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > After the horror that was EC wouldnt mind trying to salvage some > > dignity here. > > > Anyone have any tips from any of the Prep courses on what may be more > > likely than not-would really help to prioritise with such a massive > > course. > > > Also anyone have a short note on Quinn v Mid-Western Helath Board they > > coulsd post, cant seem to find anything on it in my notes. > > > Much appreciated- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
