o great thanks!!! On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:19 PM, gonzo basil <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes but also note what there doing in Australia, Walton Stores etc. > > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:19:19 +0100 > Subject: contract > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > > hi, i was just preparing for contract and a unified doctrine of > estoppel...the way i was going to lay it out would be: > > 1-Def of prom > 2-def of prop the limitations of prom > 3- similarities and differences between the two???? > and then come down that i think a unified doctrine goes against the > flexibility of equity basically lord oliver crictism in Taylors fashion of > hard and fast set rules??? > > I didnt get a chance to prepare it and get it corrected in class???? > > anybody any other ideas??? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
