Thanks a mill Brian...I was going to cover offer/accept, contractual terms, intn to create, consid, estoppel, mistake, misrep, remedies, discharge...do you think that'd be enough?
Kind regards, Frances On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Brian Foley <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On the contract paper last year, there was not much change in general > topics but obviously examined in different ways on it were, from memory > now... > > Q1, Offer, acceptance > Q2, Mistake > Q3, Estoppel > Q4, Exclusion Clauses / Sale of Goods / Terms > Q5, Discharge by Breach > Q6, Capacity > Q7(a), Ilegality > Q7(b), Ilegality and void (severance), question made little sense - > recurring issue of void / illegality terminology problems on paper > Q8(a), Privity (watch this, the report shows examiner expected it answered > differnetly to how the exact same question had been answered before) > Q8(b) Damages > > Again, the usual - formation, mistake, discharge, remedies, privity and > illegality. > > If the exam was on tomorrow and you had no more time left, that is what I > would focus on as a BARE minimum but its hardly advisable and may leave you > a question short or more. > > Regards > > Brian > > GCD > > > > On 24 September 2010 18:22, franfox <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Orla, >> >> do you know what came up on last year's contract paper? Think I'm >> panicking!!! not sure what to concentrate on!! >> >> Thanks a mill... >> >> F >> >> On 23 Sep, 21:36, Orla Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> wrote: >> > o great thanks!!! >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:19 PM, gonzo basil <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > Yes but also note what there doing in Australia, Walton Stores etc. >> > >> > > ------------------------------ >> > > Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:19:19 +0100 >> > > Subject: contract >> > > From: [email protected] >> > > To: [email protected] >> > >> > > hi, i was just preparing for contract and a unified doctrine of >> > > estoppel...the way i was going to lay it out would be: >> > >> > > 1-Def of prom >> > > 2-def of prop the limitations of prom >> > > 3- similarities and differences between the two???? >> > > and then come down that i think a unified doctrine goes against the >> > > flexibility of equity basically lord oliver crictism in Taylors >> fashion of >> > > hard and fast set rules??? >> > >> > > I didnt get a chance to prepare it and get it corrected in class???? >> > >> > > anybody any other ideas??? >> > >> > > -- >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > > "FE-1 Study Group" group. >> > > To post to this group, send an email to >> [email protected]. >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> >> <fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> >> > > . >> > > For more options, visit this group at >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. >> > >> > > -- >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > > "FE-1 Study Group" group. >> > > To post to this group, send an email to >> [email protected]. >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> >> <fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> >> > > . >> > > For more options, visit this group at >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.- Hide quoted >> text - >> > >> > - Show quoted text - >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "FE-1 Study Group" group. >> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. >> >> > > > -- > > Brian Foley LL.B (Dub), Ph.D (Dub), Barrister-at-Law > > Law Library, Four Courts > Dublin 7, DX 818 074 > Ph: (085) 1483709 | (01) 817 7367 > Fax: (01) 507 8620 > > This E mail is from Brian Foley, Barrister-at-Law. The E-mail and any > files transmitted with it are confidential and may be privileged and are > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > addressed. If you are not the addressee you are prohibited from disclosing > its content, copying it or distributing it otherwise than to the addressee. > If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the > sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the e-mail from your computer. > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
