On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 05:36:03PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > TBH I think you should file a review for Fedora anyway. As long as it > > has some working functionality, it is better to have this package than > > to not have a package at all. You can always add new features to a > > package later. > > But the package name should get sorted out first. I think it should be > called just mingw32-qt.
Agreed - it should match the Fedora native package name (qt). The reason that I named it 'mingw32-qt-win' was because it is a separate codebase / tarball from the Unix version of Qt. I don't know exactly how much code is really shared, but upstream distributes three separate zip files corresponding to Unix / Win / Mac. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
