Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> added the comment: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:43:11PM +0000, Andy Taylor wrote: > > We've re-written our EULA, and we now explicitly exclude any included Open > Source Software (such as FFmpeg) from the definition of "Cooliris Software" in > Section 1 of our EULA "License Grant". In this way, any restrictions to the > defined "Cooliris Software" do not apply to FFmpeg, and subsequent users are > free to use it under FFmpeg license terms.
I read section 1 of your EULA and cannot see anything of the sort in there. You make some vague statements about open source software and licenses, but by no stretch of imagination does the EULA express what you just claimed. You should make crystal clear that the terms of the EULA do not apply to those external parts. Your restrictions on reverse engineering are in direct conflict with LGPL paragraph 6. It again took me no more than five minutes to find holes in your EULA big enough to drive a truck through. Come back when you have really done your homework, don't play us for fools. ____________________________________________________ FFmpeg issue tracker <[email protected]> <https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue534> ____________________________________________________
