Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> added the comment: Let's try to be constructive here. I think one of the issues that Diego is referrin to is that the paragraph is still vague in what license terms are "different". Is it different in that the restrictions do still apply, but the LGPL applies in addition? Or is it instead? Which terms apply to which parts?
What you want to do is to make it very explicitely clear in this paragraph that the source and binary that contain parts of the "Open Source Software" are excluded from all restrictions mentioned subsequently in the whole remainder of the EULA, including mention of which dlls are excluded from the restrictions (see original post, point 4a, b and c). ____________________________________________________ FFmpeg issue tracker <[email protected]> <https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue534> ____________________________________________________
