Am 26.12.25 um 11:45 schrieb Reindl Harald via ffmpeg-user:
Am 26.12.25 um 11:30 schrieb Richard Bartczak via ffmpeg-user:
Am 26.12.25 um 11:27 schrieb Reindl Harald via ffmpeg-user:
Am 26.12.25 um 10:31 schrieb Richard Bartczak via ffmpeg-user:
Am 26.12.25 um 09:46 schrieb Reindl Harald via ffmpeg-user:
Am 25.12.25 um 19:57 schrieb Richard Bartczak via ffmpeg-user:
I did try to compress h.262 videos to h.265 and would expect, if
I compress it to half of the size a comparison e.g. with vivictpp
would give a result, that nearby no difference will be seen.
hwo do you come to the idea when you take a already lossy source
and convert it to another lossy codec you won't see no quality
degradation
common sense: each time you use a lossy encoding you are losing
additional information and quality becomes worse
What kind of video do you know, only RAW video format, the standard
what you get, obviously, please give us the source.
what's wrong with you?
everytime you apply a lossy codec to any audio / video / picture
format you lose information and quality - that's simply common sense
and defined by lossy
Whats wrong with you, we live in a world of lossy, you not ? Then
give me an example !
an example for what?
you don't compress a lossy video to a differnt lossy format or have to
accept quality loss - and stop quoting the list footer moron
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
an example of your world, a non lossy video format video, from where you
did get.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
