On 26.04.2002 0:11 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote >> On 25.04.2002 22:51 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote >> >>> PS is simply irrelevant to me and certainly to the vast majority of >>> Windows users. >> >> Well, it is certainly not irrelevant if you ever have to give something to a >> professional printing service to be printed in colour. > > Nothing I wrote implied that it was irrelevant to everyone, so your > answer is really a non sequitur, and exactly what's wrong with these > kinds of discussions.
David, May I remind you that it was you who started the discussion, by entering a discussion which was originally only concerned with changes from System 8 to System 9 on the Mac. You immediately took one pretty minor point, which in addition you never quite understood (there are no hardwired application or documents folders on Mac, it is just that some recent applications _expect_ these folders to be present - it is not the OS that does this) and used it to bash the Mac platform. There was no real cause for this at all. Philip then remarked that for him it was more important to have system support for certain features like PS printing, than being able to configure the paths for the applications folder. This discussion has now gone into Windows boot managers etc, which really hasn't got anything to do with the original problem. So perhaps this is the problem with the discussion, which to be honest never had any potential to lead anywhere at all. I expected this to happen as soon as you entered the discussion, which was why I said I hesitate to go on. It escapes me why whenever a discussion about any Mac specific problems, even short comings comes up you have to enter it with non-knowledge on Mac issues just to question the quality of the Mac System per se. Johannes -- http://www.musikmanufaktur.com http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
