If you are going to use this, I would think it would be a ratio, not a fraction: div. 2:1 but I have never seen it printed this way. Granted I'm not a violinist and most of the divisi I have seen as a trumpet player is a simple split, half and half.
Darcy James Argue wrote: > On 9/30/02 5:32 PM or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > intoned: > > >>I've seen this indicated div. 2/1 or div. 2-1. > > > Ah. That nomenclature hadn't occurred to me. As I said in an earlier post, > I was going to write "2/3" above the staff and "1/3" below, but I can see > how that would be confusing for someone used to seeing it as you list it > above. How about "Div 2:1" (For the style you suggest, I think it really > ought to be a ratio, not a fraction.) > > - Darcy > > ------ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Boston, MA > > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > -- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
