At 8:36 PM 10/12/02, Michael Edwards wrote:

>     I wasn't saying there was a justification, and I can't envisage a
>situation
>where it would seem called for on this list, or on most lists.  I simply added
>the proviso to cover unforeseen situations where it *might* be
>appropriate.  (It
>might be a bit too dogmatic to say it could *never* be justified.)
>     A filter to strip attachments (which I suppose is what you mean by
>binaries) is possible, and at least two Yahoo! lists I belong to actually do
>this.  (One of them is the Orchestra List, which some on the Finale list belong
>to also.)

Yes, stripping attachments is what I meant[*]. A filter to strip
attachments is easy.  A filter to strip attachments which also leaves a way
to let them in under special circumstances adds an extra layer of
complication.  I see no reason to add the extra effort.

I agree that there's no need to block the entire post; just strip out the
offending elements.

mdl

[*] And a more accurate way of putting it, too.  I'm used to the
old-fashioned terms, but I guess the distinction between text files and
binary files barely exists anymore....


_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to