At 04:49 PM 06/25/2004, Eric Dannewitz wrote: >Oh, and now I can >comment this topic even though your previous email said I shouldn't???
I didn't say you shouldn't -- I said there wasn't much point. When we're talking about bugs which undoubtedly exist, and how Coda might respond to them, I don't think it really advances the discussion for someone to say they haven't encountered those bugs.
>Which however does not mean that the program is not useful and >productive to most all of us. If you read what you guys have been >saying, you get the idea that Finale 2004 is not usable at all. It is >totally usable.
On the Win side, I agree that it is usable. (I think some on the Mac side might disagree.) But I'm looking for more than 'usable' when I purchase commercial software. If you bought a new car which was 'usable' -- got you from point A to point B -- wouldn't you still feel frustrated if the wheels were out of alignment, and there was no windshield wiper fluid, and one of the doors didn't close properly?
Aaron.
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
