On 26 Sep 2005 at 6:09, dhbailey wrote: > I find a noticeable difference in the upper partials, especially in > the viola's sound. The 192 sounds a bit richer.
I'll have to listen for that. > In my own tests to determine best encoding rates, I have found such a > tiny change between 192 and anything higher that I am very satisfied > with 192 encoding, since most of the change in tone that I do notice > makes no difference on the headphones or speakers I listen to the MP3 > files through. But I notice a big change between 128 and 192, with a > noticeable dropoff in upper partials which deadens the tone noticeably > enough for me not to like it. I find that the difference between these two files is more in the ambience than it is in the actual instruments. To my ear, it's as though the 192 file was recorded in a slightly more live room, even though both files derive from the exact same source file. -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
