They're prettier too ;) Anyway, you may not need it at the time of purchase but, who knows if you do and since such an investment spans at least 2 years, it seems smarter to plan for the possibility. Why be limited when you can be flexible?
_AJ > From: "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:04:54 -0400 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: Mac Pro unveiled > > On 8 Aug 2006 at 18:49, AJ Azure wrote: > >> No one is mentioning this but, I can make it much simpler for you all. >> MACS are better. One reason? The new platform runs OSX AND WinXP. PCs >> can't do that yet right? If you need dual platform for work and/or you >> may want software that one or the other does not run. MACS are the >> only answer. > > But if you don't need either of those things, your first statement IS > FALSE. Macs are only better if you have those needs. If you don't, > they aren't. > > -- > David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com > David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ > > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
