On Oct 14, 2006, at 5:44 PM, shirling & neueweise wrote:


From: Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Also the way spacing changes when there are accidentals - Finale doesn't do TOO
badly,

uh... sorry.  can you repeat that!?



Heh, heh! I suppose I am revealing my deficiencies in my eye by statements like that!

A little later in my message I mentioned that Finale does much better with spacing when there is a lot of room; that goes a long way to improving spacing when accidentals are present. Tightly spaced parts, as Mark D. Lew mentioned, get very labour-intensive to get right. Maybe in my case even more labour-intensive, since I don't really know what I am doing.

Christopher
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to