On Oct 14, 2006, at 5:44 PM, shirling & neueweise wrote:
From: Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Also the way spacing changes when there are accidentals - Finale
doesn't do TOO
badly,
uh... sorry. can you repeat that!?
Heh, heh! I suppose I am revealing my deficiencies in my eye by
statements like that!
A little later in my message I mentioned that Finale does much better
with spacing when there is a lot of room; that goes a long way to
improving spacing when accidentals are present. Tightly spaced parts,
as Mark D. Lew mentioned, get very labour-intensive to get right.
Maybe in my case even more labour-intensive, since I don't really
know what I am doing.
Christopher
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale