On 24/11/2007, Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 24, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Adam Golding wrote: > > > On 24/11/2007, Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Playback is part of the articulation definition, so there is no > >> problem with most situations. > > > > > > > > hrm perhaps i'm confused, but i was under the impression that human > > playback > > ignores these definitions, and makes its own decisions based on what > > articulation it is, and that this functionality would be broken if i > > randomly switched to another font... > > > You may very well be right. Maybe I'm the one who is confused. I > frankly don't mess with it all that often. > > I know many users have asked for some sort of documentation about how > Human Playback makes its decisions, and been frustrated. > > You sound like you are well ahead of me in your understanding of > playback, so I'll shut up now. > > Christopher
ha, not really, the documenation is just obscure and i'm randomly guessing what it actually does, so i think we're both in the dark ;-) _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
