Victor Eijkhout wrote:
> 
> Why are both gs 6 & 7 listed with fink?
> Somehow 6 got installed. What breaks if I deinstall it and install 7?
> Do I need 7?

It's common wisdom that 7 produces pdf output that is not correctly
rendered by MacOSX. At least this is the official reason for the
existence of ghostscript6. I can confirm it from my own experience. You
can at worst get pdfs that when viewed in Preview just show some
randomly scattered symbols instead of nice formulas, and at best texts
with wrong kerning after some ligatures. At one time you could produce
kernel panics by just opening certain pdf files in Preview. There may be
other problems I forget. 

On the other hand, my experience dates back from the ancient times of
OSX 10.0.x. It is quite possible that nobody has rechecked this problem
in more recent times. So you could do a service to the community by
installing and testing 7. If possible, test it with all combinations of
ps2pdf vs pdflatex and Preview vs Acrobat 5 and screen output vs
printing. Although, if you installed TeX via fink, you won't be able to
do this, because tetex-base depends explicitly on ghostscript6. 

Anyway, even with ghostscript6, there are bugs in OSX' pdf engine: Some
people can't print correctly from Preview, although the screen output is
correct, and have to use Acrobat Reader instead. For me it's the
opposite: Preview prints correctly whereas Acrobat replaces some fonts
by Courier when printing. This is with latex->dvips->ps2pdf. When I use
pdflatex, Preview is not able to print the 'agrave' symbol: it should be
'�', but it is '`a' with the a overprinting the following character. And
so forth...

-- 
Martin

_______________________________________________
Fink-beginners mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners

Reply via email to