David,
please allow me to respond more in general than to specific comments. I
think I have to rephrase and sum up everything a bit, otherwise the
discussion will degenerate into details and nobody will understand
anymore what we were initially talking about.
Step for step:
Motivation: I don't like giving personal details because I know what
can be done with it. I detest collecting of my personal data in general
because the data can and will be used in ways that I did not envision
when I initially provided the data. That's just the way it is. To
prevent mis-use (instead of just use) I prefer to not give the data at
all.
Action: With the motivation described above, I simply had to question
the fundamental need and your motiviation for this survey. Trigger
response, so to speak :-)
Reaction: You gave me the answers. Your reasoning was too far-fetched
for my non-marketing view (maybe I'm just not enough of a visionary),
so I still don't see the need for most questions. If I were to follow
my train of thought to the end, the logical consequence would be that I
question the need for your position as marketing guy. But that is on my
personal level, which as you said is of no interest here.
Resolution: On the public level I am completely satisfied. We have
discussed it and now I see the general consensus is that we need the
survey. Of course, I accept this without further ado.
I hope I could clear up some things that may have become tangled
already in the previous thread. On my side I regard the discussion as
closed and I won't reply in public to further comments unless they open
up new issues.
Thanks
Patrick
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
- Re: [Fink-devel] The very first, general Fink Survey, P... S Woodside
- Re: [Fink-devel] The very first, general Fink Survey, P... Patrick Näf
- Re: [Fink-devel] The very first, general Fink Surv... David
- Re: [Fink-devel] The very first, general Fink ... Benjamin Reed
- Re: [Fink-devel] The very first, general Fink ... Patrick Näf
- Re: [Fink-devel] The very first, general F... Alexander Strange
- Re: [Fink-devel] The very first, general F... David
- Re: [Fink-devel] The very first, gener... Patrick Näf
- Re: [Fink-devel] The very first, ... Hisashi T Fujinaka
- Being "annoying" --... David
- Re: [Fink-devel] The very first, general Fink Surv... Martin Costabel
- Re: [Fink-devel] The very first, general Fink Surv... Benjamin Reed
- Re: [Fink-devel] The very first, general Fink Surv... S Woodside