On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:34:51AM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Am 03.05.2010 um 01:27 schrieb Jack Howarth:
>
> > Max,
> > How am I supported to interpret the sudden appearance
> > of...
> >
> > Taking over
> >
> > JF
> >
> > in
> > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2994489&group_id=17203&atid=414256
> > immediately after I make the wrong choice (in JF's eyes) of the two
> > alernatives
> > for packaging the info files that Daniel Macks gave me? Am I to expect
> > the packages to be seized whenever a particular reviewer disagrees
> > with documentation packaging issues. I would note that even debian
> > doesn't package the info files for gcc-4.4 at all.
> > Jack
>
> The "taking over" is usual jargon when somebody assigns a ticket to himself,
> to mark the event. I.e. JFM has taken over responsibility for handling your
> submission ticker, and thus declared that he will work with you on getting
> this into Fink. Or, even more bluntly, he promised to spend his spare time to
> help you.
>
> He is in particular nor "taking over" your *package*.
Max,
Okay. I read them out of order then. At first I was uncertain from the message
in the gcc44-4.4.4-1000 entry, but coupled with the interest in maintainership
shown in the message in the gcc45-4.5.0-1000 and the impact of your telling
me that I'll get back commit access when I prove myself... you do the math.
It appears that some maintainers are expected to take far more crap than others.
Jack
>
> Bye,
> Max
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
