Hi,

Jack, I am sure that Jean-Francois was trying to be helpful, and was doing a 
task that I basically asked him to do, as I did not feel that I had the time 
for it. I do however understand your reaction, you have good reason to be wary, 
but he was only taking over ownership of the ticket, not the package.

As for effort, I don't know if the rest of the people on this list know quite 
how much effort you have put into GCC. It's pretty simple - without Jack's 
efforts* it is extremely likely that gcc-4.5 would not work on Mac OS X. There 
would be no argument about packaging the damn thing for Fink, there would be 
nothing worth packaging. Jack has put in more time and effort to the GCC 
project than I have ever put into an unpaid project.

Should Jack have commit to Fink's CVS?
My honest opinion is yes, but I think he'd either have to be restricted by 
technical means (cvs acls?) to committing to only his packages, or he could be 
asked to make that commitment himself. Even that restriction should be removed 
after some period, so that he can be in an equal position to other maintainers 
with commit privileges. Every probationary period must have some end. I am 
lucky, however, in that I don't get to make that decision.

I was ready to commit whatever package Jack had last time I looked at it, but 
Jack decided to look again to see if he could have the various GCC packages 
installable simultaneously, and asked me to wait. This is not the action of 
some irresponsible maintainer who cares little for users having to rebuild a 
huge package again and again.

Jack, I see from the ticket that Jean-Francois offered to do the 
update-alternatives work for you if you wanted, personally, I would have taken 
that offer :-)

Also, remember that you are not being forced into doing anything, I am 
confident that Jean-Francois would accept and test any package that you declare 
final, even if you decide to disregard his advice. Similarly, I am sure that he 
would commit any such GCC package that is not obviously broken or worse than 
current GCC packages. He's only trying to help and offer advice - just as I 
asked him to do, he deserves no part of any blame here.

Thanks,
Peter

*  Ok, so others worked on it too, including Iain and Dominique, but I think 
it'd be a pretty sad compiler without Jack.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to