On Saturday, July 13, 2002, at 06:49  PM, Chris Devers wrote:
>
> Ahh, ok, thanks. So when the regular "fink remove system-libgl" fails 
> with
> complaints that like a dozen other packages depend on system-libgl, this
> dpkg trick will work in a roughly nondisruptive way? Something else that
> provides 'libgl' will be re-installed from the new system-xfree86? This
> solution sounds possibly destructive, so I just want to be sure.

system-libgl is no longer needed because system-xfree86 provides libgl. 
That's the bug, it should be removable since the new package provides 
what the old one did.

-Ben



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to