On 30/10/11 20:59, Peter Dyballa wrote: [] > How often do I need to state that I was using *some* modern compiler > to build a (MacPorts affiliated, because its the only provider of Open > Source 64-bit binaries) 64-bit version of GNU Emacs on purpose? And just
Are they distributing binaries now? I didn't know. > as I imagined only a very small number of "Fink files" was used, all > parts of the compiler packages. You have also been told several times that in order to get a 64bit compiler from Fink, you need to install 64bit Fink. BTW, from your error messages it seems that it is not the *compiler* that doesn't like 64bit, but the linker. The compiler produced all those dispnew.o etc object files that are indeed 64bit, but it tries to link a 32bit binary. Did you try to tell the *linker* to produce a 64bit binary, too? It probably won't work if you need libgcc.a, because that one is 32bit, but it seems to me you haven't even tried. -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook in minutes. BlackBerry App World™ now supports Android™ Apps for the BlackBerry® PlayBook™. Discover just how easy and simple it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
