On 30/10/11 22:45, Peter Dyballa wrote: > > Am 30.10.2011 um 22:02 schrieb Martin Costabel: > >>> How often do I need to state that I was using *some* modern compiler >>> to build a (MacPorts affiliated, because its the only provider of Open >>> Source 64-bit binaries) 64-bit version of GNU Emacs on purpose? And just >> >> Are they distributing binaries now? I didn't know. > > I used the term "providing" which is not the same as distributing.
You even said "the only provider", so it must be something that Fink doesn't do. >> BTW, from your error messages it seems that it is not the *compiler* that >> doesn't like 64bit, but the linker. The compiler produced all those >> dispnew.o etc object files that are indeed 64bit, but it tries to link a >> 32bit binary. >> >> Did you try to tell the *linker* to produce a 64bit binary, too? It probably >> won't work if you need libgcc.a, because that one is 32bit, but it seems to >> me you haven't even tried. > > Since GCC 4.6 has no Apple extensions and it is used as the linker as well > there is only -m64, maybe I can also use the -march= and -mtune= switches. > And finally I could also try GCC 4.2 as linker! But on your linker line, there was no -m64 or any other invitation to build a 64bit binary. -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook in minutes. BlackBerry App World™ now supports Android™ Apps for the BlackBerry® PlayBook™. Discover just how easy and simple it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
