Am 30.10.2011 um 22:02 schrieb Martin Costabel:
>> How often do I need to state that I was using *some* modern compiler
>> to build a (MacPorts affiliated, because its the only provider of Open
>> Source 64-bit binaries) 64-bit version of GNU Emacs on purpose? And just
>
> Are they distributing binaries now? I didn't know.
I used the term "providing" which is not the same as distributing.
>
> BTW, from your error messages it seems that it is not the *compiler* that
> doesn't like 64bit, but the linker. The compiler produced all those dispnew.o
> etc object files that are indeed 64bit, but it tries to link a 32bit binary.
>
> Did you try to tell the *linker* to produce a 64bit binary, too? It probably
> won't work if you need libgcc.a, because that one is 32bit, but it seems to
> me you haven't even tried.
Since GCC 4.6 has no Apple extensions and it is used as the linker as well
there is only -m64, maybe I can also use the -march= and -mtune= switches. And
finally I could also try GCC 4.2 as linker!
--
Greetings
Pete
If builders built buildings the way programmers write programs, then the first
woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization.
– Weinberg's Second Law
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook
in minutes. BlackBerry App World™ now supports Android™ Apps
for the BlackBerry® PlayBook™. Discover just how easy and simple
it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
