On 14/03/2013 12:55, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > The trouble of this solution is that many people use snapshot builds, > already named 2.5.3. And it has a number of other bugs fixed. > > Everything would be easier if we were using versions numbers in a more sane way.
We do use two slots (say, 2.5) to actually represent major versions. If we were using only one: 1.0.0 = 1.0.0 1.5.0 = 2.0.0 2.0.0 = 3.0.0 2.1.0 = 4.0.0 2.5.0 = 5.0.0 2.5.1 = 5.1.0 2.5.2 = 5.2.0 3.0.0 = 6.0.0 We would use the third digit for emergency fixes. Then we would be discussing the 5.2.1 (5.2 = our current 2.5.2) and (.1 = emergency fix). But since we don't, I do not know if it's possible (or desired) to use another group (for 2.5.2.1 more the build number). Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
