On Thursday 14 March 2013 17:07:15 Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 14/03/2013 12:55, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > > The trouble of this solution is that many people use snapshot builds, > > already named 2.5.3. And it has a number of other bugs fixed. > > Everything would be easier if we were using versions numbers in a more > sane way. > > We do use two slots (say, 2.5) to actually represent major versions. >
That seems like a recipe for version number hyper-inflation to me. In no time at all we will be into double figures for version numbers - perhaps even triple before the end of the decade! It can't be allowed - if nothing else firebird stands for prudent version numbering. We must resist this temptation - look where it got firefox. :-) Paul -- Paul Reeves http://www.ibphoenix.com Supporting users of Firebird ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
