On 15-3-2013 20:16, Anthonys Lists wrote: > On 14/03/2013 19:34, Michal Kubecek wrote: >> I guess there is no perfect solution with the versions we have now but >> to avoid making the version more messy than necessary, this emergency >> release should IMHO be called 2.5.2, not 2.5.3 or even higher. So the >> best (or rather least bad) is IMHO 2.5.2.26540
> Does the version number need to be numeric? A system I'm used to from > the 80s :-) used patch letters so this would be 2.5.2a - ie 2.5.2 with a > bugfix. I am sure some things will break if that is included in the response to an info call with isc_info_firebird_version. For example Jaybird parses that response with the assumption that the version part of the full string only includes numbers. > (Let me introduce myself - I've just joined this list because I'm trying > to get into database programming in LO, and so I'll probably be > struggling to write the official LO firebird connector soon :-) Welcome! Mark -- Mark Rotteveel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
