On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:07:15PM -0300, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > Everything would be easier if we were using versions numbers in a more > sane way. > > We do use two slots (say, 2.5) to actually represent major versions. > > If we were using only one: > 1.0.0 = 1.0.0 > 1.5.0 = 2.0.0 > 2.0.0 = 3.0.0 > 2.1.0 = 4.0.0 > 2.5.0 = 5.0.0 > 2.5.1 = 5.1.0 > 2.5.2 = 5.2.0 > 3.0.0 = 6.0.0 > > We would use the third digit for emergency fixes. Then we would be > discussing the 5.2.1 (5.2 = our current 2.5.2) and (.1 = emergency fix).
>>I like this but of course it is too late for versions <3.0. But from 3.0 >>on, it IMHO makes very good sense. >>> Michal Kubeček Hi, if you need to change numbering at all then better will be storing date in it e.g. FB2.1.2013.03.14 FB2.5.2013.03.14 ... this is understandable for all users i think regards, Karol Bieniaszewski ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
