some other packages use 2.5.3-1
On 14 March 2013 15:55, Alex Peshkoff <peshk...@mail.ru> wrote:
> On 03/14/13 18:51, Stefan Heymann wrote:
> >>> What I do not understand - what number will get that release? It's
> >>> definitely not 2.5.3. May be Firebird-2.5.2.26540-1? (We had
> >>> Firebird-2.5.2.26539-0).
> >> This may cause confusion with Firebird-2.5.3.26540 which does not have
> >> the bug fixed. But I'm out of better ideas.
> > I don't know how your versions are organized. But for us users out
> > there it would be difficult to distinguish Firebird by build numbers
> > or, even worse, sub-build numbers.
> >
> > So the most honest and straightforward thing would be to call this
> > 2.5.3 and everything that comes later will then be 2.5.4 and so on.
> >
> > There are customers out there who are very concerned about security
> > and for them there should also be a note in the release notes.
>
> The trouble of this solution is that many people use snapshot builds,
> already named 2.5.3. And it has a number of other bugs fixed.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
> Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
>
--
Nick Upson, Telensa Ltd
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
