On Jul 28, 8:03 am, Winfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree that this group and folks who post on it are not a
> representative sample of FireBug users.
>
> However, searching twitter for people mentioning FireBug and sampling
> their opinions might be an easier way to get a high-level feeling for
> reactions that DOES sample a much larger, more representative
> audience:
>
> http://twitter.com/#search?q=firebug
While the sample may be larger, you did not convince me that it was
more representative.
But let's give up on the vote/poll idea. There aren't any developers
to implement any results from such a poll anyway.
I remain open to discussions of improvements to Firebug 1.4 that are
thoughtful and which don't rehash decisions we made and explained a
few times already.
>
> The anecdotal samples I've pulled from the FireBug twitter stream over
> the last week have had many complaints about this behavior in FB1.4.
Which "this behavior"?
jjb
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
